Celebrating 30 years.

Resource Center

Articles, datasheets, technical data, cross reference guides and more. All in one place.

Articles

Class 1 Ceramic Capacitors are First Class

Posted by Mike Randall on July 09, 2014

6

Greetings designers!  Until to now, we have discussed Class 2 dielectric (usually ferroelectric) MLCCs.  These are excellent capacitors, having a high very volumetric efficiency or capacitance per unit volume.  But, as we have discussed in previous blog posts, they have some drawbacks, such as temperature and voltage sensitivity of capacitance, etc.  In most cases, circuit designers can circumvent these issues and these devices are ideal for their applications.  But what happens when you need high temperature or voltage stability, or when you cannot tolerate piezoelectric or micro-phonic effects or capacitance aging?  In that case, there is a solution; you need a “first class” dielectric…you need Class 1 dielectric in your MLCC.  Class 1 dielectrics will help you meet your stability needs at the expense of capacitance per unit volume, compared to Class 2 dielectrics. 

Enter Class 1 Dielectric MLCC

Class 1 dielectric MLCCs are comprised of a different type of dielectric chemistry that does not exhibit ferroelectric behavior.  They are generally termed linear dielectrics.  Class 1 is an Electronics Industry Association (EIA) designation and these dielectrics are typically based on magnesium titanate, or calcium titanate, or neodymium titanate, or barium neodymium titanate or strontium calcium zirconium titanate materials, or the like.  They are called “linear dielectrics” because their dipole response associated with changing electrical field is linear in character. These dielectrics are highly stable with respect to numerous environmental factors.  They exhibit properties (primarily K and df) that do not change appreciably with changing temperature or voltage or pressure, or frequency, etc.  Additionally, they do not age (i.e., loose capacitance over time), and they do not “buzz” or convert vibration to output signal noise.  The most common designation within Class 1 dielectrics is the C0G.  There are numerous other designations for Class 1 dielectrics as well, such as C0H, etc.  More specifics about these designations may be found via the following link.  C0G is the most common and the most stable EIA Class 1 dielectric designation.  Many people (usually us “old timers”) still call it NPO, even though the two designations really shouldn’t be used interchangeably.

A Stable Ally

If you need a highly stable capacitor of value ~0.22 µF or less for your 100V or lower rated application, you should consider C0G MLCC (high voltage versions are available as well).  These capacitors are very stable with respect to temperature (i.e., capacitance varies +/- <=30 ppm/C from -55C to +125C), they typically have dissipation factors (df) well less than 0.1% and they do not experience capacitance aging.  They also have very low dielectric absorption and they do not exhibit significant piezoelectric or micro-phonic effects.  Class 1 C0G MLCCs also typically have low ESR and relatively low ESL and are typically available in sizes from 2225 (EIA) down to 01005 (EIA).  You will give up about 100 fold capacitance per unit volume with respect to Class 2 MLCC or tantalum capacitors, but Class 1 MLCC can have volumetric efficiencies that are equal to or better than film capacitors.  C0G MLCCs are also highly reliable and can be quite robust mechanically, if the dielectric used is zirconate based (SCZT or the like). 

Recent Developments

Just as with Class 2 dielectric MLCCs, Class 1 MLCCs have advanced over the years as well.  C0G MLCCs are now available with base metal internal electrodes (BME) and with relatively thin layers (~4µm dielectric thickness or less) and with very high layer counts (over 300 layers in some cases).  This has enabled a strong increase in capacitance per unit volume in C0G MLCCs, similar to the volumetric efficiency advances with Class 2 dielectric MLCCs discussed in previous blog posts.  However, the dielectric constants are still relatively low (ranging from ~10 to ~100 in most cases) as compared to Class 2 dielectrics (which typically exhibit dielectric constants on the order of 3,000 or higher), so even though C0G MLCCs have advanced greatly, it is still about 100 fold less than Class 2 MLCC with regard to capacitance per unit volume. 

Additionally, new SCZT (strontium calcium zirconium titanate) based dielectrics with either precious metal internal electrodes (PME) or base metal internal electrodes (BME) enable relatively high rated voltage per unit dielectric thickness.  This has enabled highly robust C0G MLCCs such as an EIA 1206 (3216 metric) 50V rated 0.1 µF, for example, that is basically “bulletproof.”  These dielectrics are robust with respect to temperature stability, df, and reliability.  Finally, the advent of low K dielectrics combined with copper BME internal electrodes in a Class 1 dielectric MLCCs has enabled very high quality factor (Q) capacitors that are excellent for high frequency applications.  These advancements have enabled the development of C0G MLCCs that are suitable for most needs at or below 0.22 µF.

First Class all the Way!

Class 1 dielectric MLCCs have advanced in a manner that is similar to Class 2 MLCCs.  In the same vein as “A Farad on the Head of a Pin for Free,” you can now get more capacitance in a smaller package, for less $, all with higher voltage rating and better reliability.  So when you need a stable, robust capacitor in the 0.22 µF or less range, always look for the C0G MLCC solution first, because Class 1 dielectrics are definitely First Class.  TTFN!

Tags: tantalum capacitors, esr, tantalums, Capacitors, ferrite beads, esl

Conflict Minerals Infographic Refresh

Posted by Chris Gutierrez on June 12, 2014

 

The Conflict Minerals issue has been around for a few years now, but only recently has it become something that more people are taking notice of. The ambitious Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act was signed into law in 2010 and brought considerable attention to this sensitive subject. For those who may want an overview of the issue, Venkel Ltd. has developed an infographic that illustrates the Conflict Minerals issue.

This infographic briefly defines what a conflict mineral is and follows up with a map that shows worldwide production of each mineral. We have also included a graphical representation of the estimated amount of funds that are going to the armed conflict within the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Below this is a list of the major players involved in the trade of these minerals. We closed out the infographic with several human rights groups that have more information on the subject. We hope that you find this an informative resource. Please feel free to contact us with any questions or suggestions related to this infographic.

Conflict Minerals continue to be a topic of discussion leaving us wanting to learn more. Not to mention, the laws that are now in effect for the electronics industry.

Which brings me to the question; do you really know the affects these minerals have on The Democratic Republic of the Congo?

In our newly redesigned infographic we show you these details in a creative format.

Let’s Rewind  

In 2011 Venkel released our "Conflict Minerals 3TG" infographic. You may have seen this in numerous places on the web or even in a training session or webinar on the topic.

The infographic is based on information from 2009 data made available by the USGS. Since then much has changed. Not just the amount of money funding the war in the DRC but also the top 5 producers of conflict minerals Tin, Tungsten, Tantalum and Gold also known as 3TG.

Fast Forward to the Present

Venkel recently released a 2014 refresh of the infographic, using 2011 USGS data.

Although some parts may look similar to the 2011 infographic, the data has changed in many ways. We will take a look at changes you would see from the 2011 vs 2014 infographic.

 2011  2014
     

DRC Mining Production in 2011 vs. 2014 (Metric Tons)
  Tungsten   Tantalum   Tin   Gold
  2011 2014     2011   2014   2011 2014    2011 2014  
  170   30   87   95   9,400   2,900   2   3.5

As you can see in the table above, the amount being mined in the DRC for Tungsten and Tin has decreased. However, Tantalum and Gold have steadily increased over time. Whether production has decreased or increased, money is still helping fund the war in the DRC. You will see in the next section just how much money is funding the war.  

Money Funding the War in 2011 vs. 2014
Tungsten Tantalum Tin Gold
2011 2014 2011 2014 2011 2014 2011 2014
$2.6M $840K $3.8M $19M $80M $60.3M  $34.5M  $106M 

The most shocking result is the amount of money Gold is funding. Gold is a big and significant part of the funds for the war in the DRC. From 2011 to 2014 the Gold funding the war has dramatically increased over 2 times the amount in 2011.  Though Tin and Tungsten have decreased over time, with Gold still being an issue it is the number 1 mineral helping fund the war as you can see.

Our new infographic can be used as a training tool helping others see the importance of this topic and the severity of trying to get a handle on the supply chains of the manufacturers of products that use either of these minerals. With the increase in demand of electronic components/devices this has made it harder to trace the actual source of these minerals. It is very important that you get with your manufactures and request smelter information to help ensure that products being sold to you are conflict-free so that together we can help slow down this epidemic.

View the updated 3TG Conflict Minerals Infographic and don't forget to sign up for email alerts that will notify you when we release updated conflict minerals content.

We may not make a huge impact right away, but together we can start to help make a change.

Please see our Conflict Minerals compliance page for information on Conflict Minerals and our products.

 Blogs de Datasheet images for Resource Center (2)

Tags: tantalum capacitors, tantalums

Subscribe to Resource Center Updates